Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MICHAEL GOODRICH's avatar

What the Stoics say about Daniel working with Nebedchunezzar (sp?)

Expand full comment
Mike Brooks's avatar

I'll disagree with Michael. This essay is relevant because it is focused on our actions in the face of perceived tyranny. It doesn't matter how the media portrays a person. What matters is how we come to judge our impressions of that person and what we do with this judgment.

Additionally, political assassination is never inferred in the article, and Stoicism isn't about controlling one's hatred or harming others, at least not specifically. It's about using reason to act in the best interest of the common good. To determine the right actions, we must look to our roles; however, Caleb reminds us that our roles as humans take precedence over the other roles.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts